External assessmentThe next step in completing the brief is for the author and/or evalation team to assess the signal strength, timing, and likely public response to the issue from an external assessment perspective. Indicators include:
- Change type: improvement | discovery | event | perspective | policy | trend | transformation | uncertainty | wild card
- Time frame: now | 5-9 years | 10 -14 years | 15-20 years | 20+ years | never
- Penetration: non-existing | trial | niche | widespread | ubiquitous
- Potential: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Likelihood: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Urgency: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Complexity: disorder | simple | complicate | complex | chaotic
- Controversy: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Geography: local | national | regional | global cyberspace | outer space
- Rate of change: instant | days | months | years | decades |
- Maturity: weak signal | emerging | growing | maturing | declining
Internal assessment
Then the client evaluation team should complete an internal assessment of the opportunities and threats faced by the organization in confronting the issues raised in the brief. Indicators include:
- Decision: tier 1 | tier 2 | tier 3 | tier 4
- Opportunity: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Motivation: legally must do | time constrained | high value | scarce resources | growth
- Cost savings: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Difficulty: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Risk: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Cost: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Approach: lead | exploit | adopt | also ran | just in time
- Prepared: very high | high | medium | low | very low
Stimulus and evidence
A good discipline is also to evaluate the stimulus offered by the brief to readers as follows:
- Inspiring: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Engaging: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Enabling: very high | high | medium | low | very low
- Novelty: shock | surprise | new news | old news | none
And to assess the quality of the evidence taken in the round:
- Credentials: expert | professional | pundit | amateur | fringe
- Bias: very impartial | somewhat impartial | balanced | somewhat partial | very partial
- Methodology: robust analysis | partial analysis | commentary | opinion led | speculative
- Assumptions: accurate | specific | deduced | faulty | inaccurate
Completing this assessment for all briefs then gives the decision and policy makers clear distinctions as to which briefs:
- Possess the most external potential.
- Must be acted on now, managed, watched, or left on the shelf for another future review.
- Represent the biggest stimulus and challenge for change.
- Are robust or which have only rudimentary evidence.
Further reference: How to Evaluate Science and Technology Forecasts
Next: Reporting Trends Back: Classifying Trends To: Shaping Tomorrow
Copyright: Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.